Preservation review is one accountability lens.

Section 106 matters where a public project may affect a historic district through indirect traffic effects. It is not the whole traffic story, but it is one way to ask whether downstream impacts were studied seriously.

Project change Traffic reassignment Historic district exposure APE / effect review

The APE question follows the traffic question.

If a project foreseeably changes traffic on historic streets, preservation review should ask whether those streets are inside the area where effects may occur.

This is a review lens, not a final finding.

The public argument should distinguish facts, evidence, inference, and advocacy. It should not be presented as an agency determination unless the record says so.